Woman fired from Citibank for attire

This is less about politics, but related. I'll paste the most egregious excerpt here from the NY Post (for more read the full article in title link):

"In blatantly discriminatory fashion, plaintiff was advised that as a result of the shape of her figure, such clothes were purportedly 'too distracting' for her male colleagues and supervisors to bear. The sexy single mom pointed out to her bosses "that other female colleagues wore similar professional attire," and that some dressed far more provocatively, the filing says. But her supervisors shot back that those women didn't have to worry about turning them on "as their general unattractiveness rendered moot their sartorial choices, unlike plaintiff," the papers say."

I found this because I often work with financial firms at my job. Just thought it's an interesting "other side" to the sexism in dressing discussion we've been having. Kagan was criticized for dressing "conservatively" whereas this woman has been punished for being too feminine (to put it in P.C. language!).

Looking through the pictures of her - there's no doubt she's a beautiful woman. But as long as she's dressing in work appropriate clothes, it's insane to say she needs to dress even more conservatively because the mostly male office she worked in couldn't handle themselves.

It's sort of disheartening to read something like this. Whether you're preference is for conservative clothing, pant suits or fashion, it's like you can't win.